Important Letter to Secondary School Headteacher – Parents Should Also Read

Sent to us by a reader. This letter contains a detailed summery of adverse reactions and dangers school children are unnecessarily exposed to, when they take the covid injection.

Please find a template letter that deconstruts the Health and Education Minister’s letter addressed to secondary school parents here: Minister’s letter to secondary school college parents-information deconstructed and challenged.

Dear [headteacher],

I have recently taken a close look at the letter sent to parents of secondary school children concerning vaccination, and was alarmed by the marked lack of information provided to aid ‘informed’ consent.

It failed to explain risks (omissions which could cause serious health problems, e.g. PEG and anaphylactic shock), made statements at odds with advice (JCVI), and overlooked studies easily found on the GOV.UK website.

I have attached the PDF containing a breakdown of the letter and it’s anomalies, including Mary Ramsey (head of vaccination at PHE) ignoring her own organisation’s study on immunity which concluded that natural immunity was long-lasting and superior to vaccination.

Emerging data on adverse reactions and deaths of children and young people from the Vaers and Yellow Card reporting systems were also ignored.

As you may well know, as of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 was no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK, therefore the rollout for children needs to be justified. [1]

Open letters from doctors, scientists and lawyers concerned about vaccinating children are essential reading. [2] [3] [4]

Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA is concerned that people know about the risks, ‘This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics…my concern is that I know that there are risks…the data haven’t been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks, and therefore … we don’t really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision.’ [5]

‘The COVID shots induce spike protein at levels unheard of in nature, and the spike protein is the toxic part of the virus responsible for the most unique effects of the virus, such as the blood clotting disorders, neurological problems and heart damage. A (adenine) and U (uracil) in the third position are rare, and the COVID shots replace these A’s and U’s with G’s (guanine) or C’s (cytosine). According to Stephanie Seneff’s study on codon optimization this switch results in a 1,000-fold greater amount of spike protein compared to being infected with the actual virus. To expect the COVID shot to not produce these kinds of effects would be rather naïve[6]

These vaccines are experimental with temporary authorisation. There are no follow-ups to ensure safety in the general population. In the trials only half of the volunteers were followed for side effects and for only two months. This is contrary to established practice where participants are closely monitored and reactions recorded and studied. Mid-or long-term effects are unknown and could impact children adversely for decades.

As data in the school letter indicates, health issues manifested in the trials, and numerous adverse effects and deaths have been reported in children and young people (Vaers and Yellow Card reporting systems).

According to Pfizer, as a result of vaccination,
‘Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The possible side effects of the vaccine are still being studied in clinical trials.’ [7]

It is not enough to say the vaccine is ‘safe’ without scientific basis and accrued data.

Basic principles of clinical medical research were violated in the rollout. As 3 phases of clinical trials with volunteers are normally completed BEFORE a vaccine is licensed this should not be offered to the public until trials end in 2023, data has been analysed and lasting safety established. Moreover, adults ordinarily would be long term participants before children are ever considered as subjects. [8]

According to Anthony Fauci, who failed to follow this advice, ‘You have to prove that this works, and then you’ve got to go through all of the clinical trials: phase 1, 2, 3, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years. …if it works perfectly, it’s going to take a decade.’ [9]

The last time a vaccine for children was rushed through on an emergency basis was in the swine flu epidemic in 2009-2010. This resulted in significant injuries, with over 1000 cases of life-changing narcolepsy in children and teenagers across Europe, and the eventual withdrawal of the Pandemrix vaccine. [10]

Many children will have immunity from the wild virus by now and this also increases the potential for serious side effects, ADE, where use of the vaccine might put vaccinees at risk of worse illness in an otherwise mild disease for young people. [11]

Young people are also not considered ‘super spreaders’ [12]

To highlight the dangers of the vaccines further:

In a letter to June Raine from Dr Tess Lawrie, ‘The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans.’
Her findings:
In the UK the Yellow Card reporting system data between January and May 2021 reported a ‘high number of covid-19 vaccine-attributed deaths and ADRs. In total, 1,253 deaths and 888,196 ADRs.

Clinically relevant categories:
A. Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs
B. Immune System ADRs
C. ‘Pain’ ADRs
D. Neurological ADRs
E. ADRs involving loss of Sight, Hearing, Speech or Smell
F. Pregnancy ADRs-6 [13]

Reproductive toxicity
Additionally, there is responsibility for the young women at school. Robert Malone has concerns about reproductive toxicity. There are potential fertility issues which you need to be aware of and reports of altered menstrual cycles and abnormal bleeding in young women following the vaccine. [14]

Pfizer’s biodistribution data show the vaccine’s accumulation in the ovaries over 48 hours:-
-2.6.5.5B. PHARMACOKINETICS: ORGAN DISTRIBUTION
Sample Total Lipid concentration (μg lipid equivalent/g [or mL])
Ovaries (females) -0.104 (1/2 hr) 1.34 (1 hr) 1.64 (2 hrs) 2.34 (4 hrs) 3.09(8 hrs) 5.24 (24 hrs) 12.3 0 (48 hrs) –Increase from 1/2 an hour to 48hrs after vaccine. [15]

In America among pregnancy-specific conditions reported to the VAERS after Covid-19 vaccination, miscarriage was the most common. As of Sept. 3, 3,558 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1042 reports of miscarriage or premature birth, and a total of 9,589 reports of menstrual disorders following a COVID injection as of September 17, 2021. [16]

More than 30,000 reports of menstrual irregularities and vaginal bleeding had been filed with the (MHRA) Yellow Card Scheme as of September 2 2021 [17]

Victoria Male, a reproductive immunology specialist at the Imperial College of London expresses concerns about the link between these bleeding irregularities and the COVID jabs.
Dr. Lawrence Palevsky, a paediatrician, believes the menstrual irregularities may be related to effects from the spike protein that women’s bodies are now producing. ‘If we were to follow the scientific method, as it was taught in textbooks … necessary questions would need to be asked [18]

Alternative treatments
Many have died unnecessarily due to our health authorities’ decision to discourage all prevention and early treatment of COVID-19. As noted by many doctors, early treatment is absolutely crucial for preventing hospitalization, death and long-term side effects of the infection.
Treatments are widely available and used in other countries with great success. Dr Peter McCullough, epidemiologist, and one of the top five most published medical researchers in the United States, is an advocate of early treatment and drug protocols. [19]

Along with many others. [20] [21]

The PRINCIPLE trial for Ivermectin is one amongst others in the UK which encourages participation. [22]

Informed consent
In the light of the above data, for parents and children alike informed consent can only exist where relevant information is provided on which to base a decision to be vaccinated.

The NHS school form provides no information on health issues before asking for consent, describing ‘side effects’ as merely a sore arm, headache or tiredness. [23]

Will the immunising clinician be sufficiently informed of the risks to convey them adequately when implementing Gillick Competence, where children need ‘to have enough intelligence, competence and understanding to fully appreciate what’s involved in their treatment.’? [24]

Will information pertaining to risks and likelihood of success, side-effects and complications (in particular serious adverse outcomes) be explained?

Will all clinicians make it known that there are ongoing trials for early treatments in the UK
(PRINCIPLE)

Will they address the issue of ‘pressure to consent’, children just hoping to go on holiday, the influence of their peers, teachers, the media and celebrities.

Exaggerated fear could also influence a child’s decision.
According to psychiatrist and medical legal expert Dr. Mark McDonald, ‘One of the worst
traumas children suffer as a result of… fearmongering is the idea that they may kill their parents or grandparents simply by being around them.
Many (people) enter a state of hysteria when they see an unmasked person, even if they look perfectly healthy and clearly are not suffering from any kind of respiratory issue. This is a highly irrational state that has no basis in reality. [25]

If information is NOT provided on which to make a decision then the following ethical codes/principles and laws of consent will have been violated:-

Montgomery versus Lanarkshire- Where a patient can prove that they were not sufficiently informed about a course of medical treatment; that they would not have consented to medical treatment had they been provided with such information; or indeed, that they would have chosen an alternative treatment (they exist) then a case may be established in medical negligence. [26]

Montgomery ruled doctors must discuss substantial uncommon risks, benefits and alternatives with patients before they can properly be consented, including those which are rare but serious. Only then may consent be fully informed.

Article 6 of Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005)- Implied consent is inadequate.

Nuremberg code-the person involved…should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension… as to enable him to make an… enlightened decision…there should be made known to him … all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or
person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.’ [27]

According to the General Medical Council, there must be awareness of :-
‘The effect of the patient’s individual clinical circumstances on the probability of a benefit or harm occurring. If you know the patient’s medical history, you’ll know some of what you need to share already, but the dialogue could reveal more.’ [28]

Will time be taken for a clinician to fact find and would a child, without a parent’s input, be capable of revealing their complete medical history?

In having any involvement in the vaccination programme for children one will need to take personal responsibility for the harm this may cause. According to Principle 1V of the
Nuremberg Code:-

‘The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.’

Notices of Liability have been served on COVID-19 clinics and individuals administering the COVID-19 vaccine without obtaining fully informed consent, freely given in accordance with the Nuremberg Code and UK and International law. Among those served is Chris Whitty. [29]

In April, Doctors for Covid Ethics served notices of liability for COVID-19 vaccine harms and deaths on all European Parliament Members. [30]

A German Children’s Rights Organisation (Kinderrechte Jetzt) has filed criminal charges against all doctors, teachers and school headmasters. [31]

 

Perhaps you are aware of all of the above issues I have raised in the letter. If so, how can you proceed?

In condoning the vaccine rollout you disregard and breach, The Education Act, Keeping Children Safe in Education and Safeguarding Children.

You fail to safeguard children by preventing ‘the impairment of children’s mental and physical health or development’.

Under the Education Act 2002 schools and colleges must ‘make arrangements to safeguard and promote the welfare of children’.

You implicate all staff by not educating them in the risks of the vaccine.
‘It is essential that everybody working in a school or college understands their safeguarding responsibilities.’ [32] [33]

Please don’t ignore the concerns of eminent doctors and scientists (not an anti vaxxer among them), and the thousands of reported vaccine related deaths and adverse reactions worldwide.

In the words of an anonymous GP in an open letter to Boris Johnson:-‘A doctor must not be complicit in the maiming or death of a person or child by exposing it to unnecessary risk… Based on the ADRs (adverse reactions) and known and unknown risks, many could not justify, administer or recommend these experimental treatments to our youth and children.’

I know of young people who have suffered Myocarditis, heart palpitations, temporary paralysis and Bell’s Palsy after the vaccine.

Would you risk any of the above with your own children?

I think it would be hard to readily dismiss all of the above, or the information included in the pdf, and I hope it gives pause for thought. I would ask you to have courage, and appeal to you in your position of power to not abuse it, but use it for the good. Consider carefully all the above wisdom and science. The health and wellbeing of future generations is at stake and your help is needed at this time.

Look forward to hearing from you,
Kind regards,
[ ]


Download template file:

Letter to Secondary School Headteacher