Is virology a pseudo-science?

Nothing changes in medicine in the same way that little to nothing changes in politics. Caitlin Johnstone writes, “Every few years, the US empire has this weird little festival where it pretends the government is changing hands and will now begin operating in a way that is meaningfully different from the way it was operating before. But then exploitation continues, injustice continues, the ecocide continues, the wars continue, the militarism continues, the imperialism continues, the propaganda indoctrination continues, and the authoritarianism and oppression continue. The behavior of the empire is no more changed by getting a new president than a corporation is changed by getting a new secretary at the front desk of its main office.”

Many would think Johnstone exaggerates to a degree, and if Trump gets back into the White House, we shall see, but it is an accurate model of what happens in pharmaceutical companies, the EPA, the FDA, and the CDC. In an area of life where science is supposed to dominate, one would think things would be different, but they are not.

Virology itself is a “Pseudoscience.”

The following is one of hundreds of examples where official narratives are challenged scientifically, but nothing changes. In a 40-minute video titled “Official Evidence that Virology is a Pseudoscience,” Canadian researcher Christine Massey explains how she and others have issued Freedom of Information requests to hundreds of scientific institutions in 40 different countries “asking for any records of anyone in the world ever finding this alleged [SARS-CoV-2] virus in the bodily fluid or tissue or excrement of any people anywhere on earth by anyone ever.”

“To date, we have responses from 216 different institutions in 40 different countries. And so far, no one has been able to provide us with even one record,” and further, “they can’t cite any record,” she said. “So they have all admitted that they don’t have a sample of the alleged virus and they don’t even know of anyone else who ever did obtain a sample of this alleged virus.”

Such a sample would be necessary “in order to sequence and characterize a particle and study it with controlled experiments, which is the foundation of the scientific method,” she continued. “And if nobody has a sample of the alleged virus, then nobody can have conducted any science.”

Massey, a former cancer biostatistician holding a Master of Science degree, provides complete documentation of her research, including a list of the organizations she contacted, which include the World Health Organization, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Research Council of Canada, Public Health of England, and hundreds more. She additionally provides a long list of their respective responses.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, who formerly served as Pfizer’s vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory, agrees that there is no sufficient evidence that the COVID-19 virus or any other virus exists. Thus, there was no pandemic but rather the killing of many with “a monstrous, long-planned attack on helpless civilians by coordinated, lethal, central planning.” (Read the full article here.)