By Andreas Oehler
The detail-oriented Swiss are taking their medical establishment to task in a big way for authorizing and administering the Covid-19 mRNA jabs, in a formal criminal complaint.
Here is a translation of “This is what the criminal complaint against Swissmedic is about” published on the SRF website on 14/11/2022:
This is what it’s about: On July 14, 2022, a lawyer submitted a 300-page criminal complaint to the responsible cantonal public prosecutor’s office on behalf of six people allegedly injured by mRNA vaccinations. It is directed against three representatives of the Swiss licensing and supervisory authority for medicinal products and medical devices (Swissmedic) and five vaccinating doctors from the Inselspital in Bern. A criminal investigation is to be opened against them. The lawyer has now gone public with a media conference.
These are the plaintiffs: The lawyer for those affected, Philipp Kruse, is a declared opponent of vaccination and Covid measures. He represented people who refused to wear masks or parents who didn’t want their children to take part in pool tests. Doctors who were noticed as corona skeptics also appeared at the media conference.
This is what the indictment says: The defendants are accused of violating basic drug law due diligence by allowing and administering the Covid 19 vaccination. There are a number of other charges listed, including intentional or possibly negligent bodily harm, endangering life, killing and abortion.
These are the alleged damages: According to lawyer Kruse, the damages range from circular hair loss, derailment of the menstrual cycle to polyarthritis, muscle weakness and chronic exhaustion to the death of a 20-year-old person. Some of the six victims listed are still unable to work. The connection to the Covid 19 vaccination was confirmed by experts in five cases. In the case of the deceased, the causal connection must be proven on the basis of pathological examinations. However, these investigations are not yet complete.
That’s what Swissmedic says: Nothing. Swissmedic does not want to comment on the ongoing court proceedings. The Federal Office of Public Health and the Federal Vaccination Commission also do not want to comment.
This is how it continues: According to the plaintiffs, the cantonal public prosecutor’s office, which has been called upon, has already opened the proceedings against the vaccinating doctors, who are still unknown.
What may fly under the radar in other countries, in terms of the lack of accountability and responsibility for Covid-19 jabbing injuries, is unlikely to pass muster in Switzerland. The Swiss proud themselves on being OBJECTIVE, diligent, thorough and just. Because of these very high public expectations, it is impossible to sweep under the carpet, gaslight, or outright ignore the laws on the books over there, let’s hope:
It is about these articles of the Medicines Act
Art. 3 Duty of care 1 Anyone who handles medicinal products must take all the necessary measures based on the current state of science and technology to ensure that the health of humans and animals is not endangered.
Chapter 8: Penal Provisions Art. 86233 Crimes and misdemeanours 1 Anyone who wilfully: a. manufactures, places on the market, uses, prescribes medicinal products without the necessary authorization or authorization, contrary to the terms and conditions associated with an authorization or authorization or contrary to the due diligence obligations stipulated in Articles 3, 7, 21, 22, 26, 29 and 42, imports, exports or trades abroad; (…).
Link to the Medicines Act.
Also of note here is that Swissmedic is the key conduit of the global vaccination programmes in partnership with Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and WHO, and also FDA.
Good luck in court!
(Source: https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/)
View the video here (in German): Strafanzeige gegen Swissmedic
“After Covid vaccination: Six people allegedly injured by side effects of mRNA vaccinations sue the regulatory authority Swissmedic for breach of duty of care and possible intentional bodily harm.
Clarification: Ms. Thi Mai-Trang Jost was referred to as a “vaccination critic” in the article. This designation is misleading in the context of the Corona pandemic, since Thi Mai-Trang Jost originally had herself vaccinated against Corona several times. She attributes her current suffering to these vaccinations and has therefore filed a complaint against Swissmedic. We apologize for the misleading name. Ms. Jost has told Tagesschau that she does not feel that we have discredited her in any way.”