Letters Defending School Children and Against the Covid Pass

The following two letters are from a father of a school child. They contain a lot of useful links to more information about why the covid jab is unnecessary and dangerous, and should come nowhere near our children.

Dear (Name of) School and Mrs L,

I am forwarding this open letter to you from the Hart Group to show the concern many scientists and doctors have over the safety of these Covid-19 shots, especially to children. They are supported by Doctors for Covid Ethics and the Covid-19 Assembly. Below is a link to a video of a Covid19Assembly lawyer who is normally pro-vaccine but is taking legal action to halt the temporary authorisation of the Covid 19 vaccine.


I have also attached a letter sent to our local MP Daisy Cooper in the hope they will be able to see there are alternatives to the Covid shot that have been suppressed and that the benefits of the Covid shot don’t outweigh the health risks to 12-18-year-olds. In point 5 of my letter, asking a child to be ‘Gillick competent’ on a medical treatment that has no long-term data and real health risks, without proper informed consent would have legal implications, as in the Bell/Tavistock High Court decision.

The link below shows the disproportionate, horrific effects they are having on young people, compared to vaccine data from the 5 years previous to 2020 (please copy and paste the link below because FireFox refuses to show it otherwise).

Thank you for the attention to this letter.

Yours sincerely,


Dear Daisy Cooper,

Thank you for taking the time to reply to me (/08/2021). I would like to reply to a few of your points in relation to the vote you may take to introduce Covid passports. I hope that you search your conscience before voting.

As you are not a member of the ruling party do you not think the government should be held to account for their actions? The Liberal Party stands for a fair, free and open society.

The Liberal Democrats exist to build and safeguard a fair, free and open society, in which we seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community, and in which no-one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity.

In an open letter to the government by notable medics and scientists they state:

You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.
Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic. https://www.covid19assembly.org/doctors-open-letter/

1. It is obvious that that one size does not fit all, and a Covid passport would result in coercion, discrimination  and medical tyranny to a phase three trial medical treatment (Covid-19 vaccine) that has no proven long term track record. The amount of controversy over these policies and injections is overwhelming and there are legions of scientists, doctors and professionals who don’t support this unconstitutional position (e.g. doctors4covidethics, The Great Barrington, Declaration, Covid19 assembly, cnbc.com covid-vaccine-passports-health-experts-are-deeply-concerned). With this, is an unprecedented censorship to anyone who opposes the official narrative by the mainstream news and social media. Robert F Kennedy encapsulates this feeling for a fair, free and open society in his new best-seller book, The Real Anthony Fauci.

Working in tandem with his long-term partner, billionaire Bill Gates, to corral Americans toward a single vaccine solution to COVID, Dr. Fauci committed zero dollars to studying or promoting early treatment with various drug combinations that could dramatically reduce deaths and hospitalizations. Meanwhile, in an assault on our First Amendment guarantee of free speech, Dr. Fauci’s Silicon Valley and media allies dutifully censored criticism of his policies on mainstream social media and collaborated to muzzle any medical information about therapies and treatments that might end the pandemic and compete with vaccines.

After effectively abolishing the First Amendment right to free speech, Dr. Fauci subverted our Seventh Amendment rights to jury trials by arranging to shield reckless and negligent pharmaceutical corporations from liability for injuries from any COVID countermeasures, including vaccines.

2. If you are saying the pandemic is not over and requires draconian laws like in Isreal and France of  Covid Passports, why does the government website say that it is not a high consequence infectious disease?

Status of COVID-19

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

Christian Perronne: I think you should put this question to the politicians, because in the history of infectious disease medicine, it has never happened that a state or politicians recommend systematic vaccinations for billions of people on the planet for a disease whose rate of mortality now is 0.05%. That’s a very low rate of mortality! And they’re making everybody afraid that there’s a new so-called “Delta variant” coming from India, but in fact all these variants are less and less virulent, and we now know that [with] this so-called “vaccine”, in the population that is inoculated at large, it is in these people that the variants emerge. https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/frances-long-time-vaccine-policy-chief-covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-and-unethical

US  Navy Surgeon with some simple and powerful data: ‘Vaccine’ is more dangerous than the illness… And what has to be the very best quote of the year…”if you think we are fighting a virus, then you will act as a victim… If you realise we are fighting a war, then you will act as a warrior.” https://t.me/SophiesOpinion/9270

3. You mention hydroxychloroquine as known to be not affective but do you know if those researchers had conflict of interests? Professor Christian Perrone was head of the department for infectious diseases at the University of Versailles since 1995 and has stated:

Christian Perronne: I was amazed by the design of the RECOVERY Trial, because on the first day, I think they used more than four or five times the European Medicines Agency’s maximum authorised dose of hydroxychloroquine. We know that hydroxychloroquine may be an adjunct of suicide if you take a very high dosage. And we see that in the RECOVERY Trial, the mortality rate was high, much higher than in other trials.

So they modified the evaluation criteria, and we are not able to gain access to the original database [indicating] at which point in time along the therapeutic course the participants died. They maybe made that information disappear.

I think that we had a problem of excess mortality in this trial due to completely stupid very high dosages of hydroxychloroquine. And when a French journalist asked the professor at, I think, Oxford University, whose name I don’t remember [Martin Landray], who was in charge of the trial, “Why did you use this very high and toxic dosage of hydroxychloroquine?”, he replied, “Oh, yes, it’s the usual dosage to treat amoebic dysentery.” I was so amazed, because hydroxychloroquine is not the [usual] treatment for amoebic dysentery.

So this guy was probably an epidemiologist—I don’t exactly know his CV [N.B.: Landray is indeed an epidemiologist]—but I saw that he didn’t understand anything about infectious diseases, about anti-infection drugs, and [yet] he was the leader of an international trial. International, because French scientists also participated in that trial. https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/frances-long-time-vaccine-policy-chief-covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-and-unethical

4. Disregarding Hydroxychloroquine there are other treatment that have been ignored. You are probably aware of the ongoing government research of Ivermectin.

So all these products, so-called “vaccines”, are useless, because we can perfectly well control an epidemic. And the best example is in India: there, you have a billion and a half people, with many different states. In the states where they treated people with ivermectin, zinc, Doxycycline and Vitamin D, the epidemic [remained] at a very low rate: it was quite [soon] finished. But in the states where they banned these antibiotic and antiviral treatments which work on the virus, and [where] they promoted the “vaccine” and also promoted Remdesivir (coming from France and Belgium, because Remdesivir was so toxic and not efficacious: the French and Belgians sent planeloads of Remdesivir to the Indian people!), in these areas of India where they used “vaccines” and Remdesivir, the epidemic came back, with new cases of mortality. That’s proof that if you treat early, you can succeed and the epidemic will be over very rapidly. https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/frances-long-time-vaccine-policy-chief-covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-and-unethical

“Cures for covid are hidden because they want to vaccinate you.”
– Biophysicist Andreas Kalcker

Biophysicist Andreas Kalcker is an internationally leading scientist who works with over 5,000 medical doctors in almost 30 nations. He has developed a 100% effective cure for COVID-19 and all its variations. This treatment has lowered the daily death rate in several Latin American nations from 100 deaths a day to virtually none. It was first tried by the police and military, and because of the life saving results it was then given to millions, who recovered in a matter of days. A clinical study has confirmed the effectiveness of this treatment. Biophysicist Kalcker was however censored on all platforms: his book was removed from Amazon, his Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and PayPal accounts were deleted, and even his scientfic account was taken down from ResearchGate. As a result his safe, effective and cheap cure for covid was hidden from humanity. In this eye-opening video you learn about the life saving treatment, and why it is suppressed.

5. You say that Pfizer, Astra Zenica and Moderna vaccines have been shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials and are working well to weaken the link between cases, hospitalisation and death. Try saying that to 1,600 families who claim they lost loved ones due to the vaccine and the people who reported over a million adverse reactions on the Yellow Card system. Where are the detailed investigations to all these ‘starting points’. If they refuse to study post-mortems then they can obfuscate the truth. Many people do not know the Yellow Card system and under reporting is historically well known. Perhaps safety and effectiveness depends on what scientific data you are looking at. Reduced Covid 19 cases can depend on the amount of cycles in PCR tests and they are not diagnostic but an aid. Also, there will always be less demand for hospital beds during the summer.

Perhaps you can explain why there is all of a sudden many high level athletes collapsing on the fields or dying of myocarditis? This video gives examples of just a few. https://brandnewtube.com/watch/healthy-high-level-athletes-dying-after-covid-jab-the-jab-is-the-disease_3mTRSVpvPwmPJ2l.html


Here is another article showing data from Israel that ‘those who have received the COVID jab are 6.72 times more likely to get infected than people with natural immunity.’  https://socrates-wellness-institute.com/60-percent-of-those-older-than-50-who-die-from-alleged-covid-are-double-vaxxed/

Vaxx’d versus Unvaxx’d – Socrates Wellness Institute (socrates-wellness-institute.com)

The MHRA is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation who in turn are promoting the Covid 19 jabs so asking the MHRA to look into the safety of them is like asking someone to check their own homework! It is what you call a conflict of interest. What many people are saying is that there has not been any proper investigation of so many deaths. (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health)

If it is so safe why is there evidence of children dying from the vaccine despite claims by mainstream media that there hasn’t been? Perhaps you would like to challenge Dr Vernon Coleman’s list of deaths and seriously damaged children after taking the Covid injection?

How Many Children Will Die Because of this Woman? (brandnewtube.com)

In addition, here are more doctors saying they are dangerous and it would be child abuse to give the Covid jab to 12-18 year olds with quotes. The Gillick competence of letting under 16 children decide cannot apply if they are not informed of the physical risks, let alone the risk of not having long term data with it’s unknown effect on fertility. The Bell/Tavistock case is an example.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-55144148

  • “If you give that jab to your child, you are committing a crime.” ~ Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi
  • “Children have very mild illness, many of them don’t realise  they’ve had COVID-19.” ~Dr. Peter McCullough
  • In fact, the risk from seasonal flu we think is probably higher than the risk of covid.” ~Dr. Jenny Harries
  • “Why would you turn around and inject them with a substance that is experimental, and has a growing number of serious side-effects, such as myocarditis?”
  • “It’s state sanctioned child abuse, period.” ~Dr. Roger Hodkinson
  • “ It’s crazy to vaccinate them with something that is actually 50 times more likely to kill them than the virus itself.”


“If you mandate vaccination of all of the children, roughly one hundred of them per million will die as a direct result of your decision, and it will save no lives.” ~Dr. Mike Yeadon

Another research by Dr Young examines the lethal undisclosed components of the Pfizer and Astra Zenica ‘vaccines’,  such as graphene oxide and “an engineered aggregate of iron, chromium and nickel also known as stainless steel of micro and nano particles embedded and identified in the Astrazeneca “vaccine” viewed under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System that reveals the chemical nature of the observed micro and nano particulates and their morphology.”

Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines (drrobertyoung.com)

“The constant refrain from the MHRA and vaccine manufacturers is that there is no proof determining how many deaths are caused by the Covid-19 vaccines. This is true insofar as post-mortem examinations and investigations by the regulators would be needed to clearly establish vaccine mortality. To date, the regulators have not shown any willingness to carry out such investigations. However, they do at least concede that the Covid-19 vaccines can be lethal.”

“PHE claims of between 55% and 70% efficacy cannot be based upon the vaccine clinical trial data, as there isn’t any, and the available interim analysis is pretty shoddy stuff. So what is the basis for this conclusion? For this, they cite some observational studies and their own surveillance reports. In other words, the PHE claims are largely based upon their own, self-referenced, reports.

For example, Public Health England’s own study considered observations of the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England. The researchers pointed out that those initially vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine faced “higher odds of testing positive for Covid-19 in the first nine days after vaccination” than the unvaccinated.” (https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/why-we-must-question-vaccine-efficacy-and-safety-claims)

Doctors for Covid ethics also write an open letter to the European Standards Agency with concern about current adverse reactions. https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/

I thank you for taking time to read various views that I hope will get nearer to the truth. As in a court of law all sides should be listened to. I will leave you with this open letter to the British Government supporting the idea that no one should be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity. The next quote is how they end the letter.

In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms. As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address. https://www.covid19assembly.org/doctors-open-letter/

Yours sincerely,

D S (BA Hons Cert Ed)